Skip to content

Canada

Workers rallied at MPs' offices in 21 communities to defend the right to strike

During constituency week, union members took their fight against Bill C-39 to the doorsteps of Mark Carney and cabinet ministers — warning the bill will make labour disputes harder, not easier, to resolve.

Published: October 17, 2026 · Updated: October 17, 2026 · 2 min read

Workers rallied at MPs' offices in 21 communities to defend the right to strike
Workers with blank signs rally outside a parliament building in this illustration. Illustration generated with AI for Serious Pick

The National Day of Action

Workers in 21 communities across Canada rallied outside MPs' constituency offices on Friday, Oct. 16, as part of a National Day of Action organized by the Canadian Labour Congress against Bill C-39, according to the labour federation. The demonstrations, timed for the week MPs spend in their home ridings, took place outside the offices of Prime Minister Mark Carney and several federal cabinet ministers.

"These changes will increase labour unrest across Canada," said Bea Bruske, president of the Canadian Labour Congress. "The government cannot credibly claim to be protecting labour stability while introducing legislation that will make disputes harder to resolve and more disruptive." The federation said some of Canada's largest unions have already pledged to defy the proposed restrictions if they become law.

Nearly 95 percent of federally regulated labour disputes are resolved without a work stoppage, the CLC said, warning that giving employers reason to expect government intervention will encourage them to hold out at the bargaining table.

What Bill C-39 would do

The legislation, formally the Building Canada Strong Act and known in Parliament as Bill C-39, was tabled by Carney's government on Sept. 21. It passed second reading in the House of Commons on Oct. 8 by a vote of 296 to 26, with the Conservatives joining the governing Liberals, according to The Canadian Press, and now sits with a special committee.

Its labour provisions would write the federal labour minister's Section 107 intervention powers into the Canada Labour Code in explicit terms, replacing years of ad hoc executive orders with a formal process, according to an analysis by Canadian HR Reporter. Under the bill, the minister could appoint a special mediator up to 75 days into conciliation, with 21 days to help the parties settle. Once a legal strike or lockout began, the minister could direct the Canada Industrial Relations Board to order a return to work, extend the collective agreement, or impose binding arbitration — but only after considering the mediator's report and concluding the national interest is affected.

Ottawa has used Section 107 about ten times since 2023 to end disputes or send them to arbitration at Canada Post, CN and CPKC railways, and the ports of British Columbia and Montreal, The Canadian Press reported. Several of those interventions are now being challenged in court as violations of constitutional freedom of association.

What comes next

The bill is now before a special House committee, where the labour provisions will face line-by-line scrutiny — and organized labour has signalled it will fight them there and beyond. The CLC says weeks of grassroots mobilization, a national advertising campaign, direct lobbying of MPs, and international condemnation have preceded Friday's rallies, and it is calling on the government to strip the strike restrictions from the bill entirely.

For Carney's government, the fight is a test of its balancing act: Bill C-39 is sold as a certainty tool for investors and nation-building projects, but the labour movement sees the strike provisions as the price workers are being asked to pay.

What matters

What happened

Union members rallied outside MPs' offices in 21 communities on Oct. 16 in a Canadian Labour Congress National Day of Action against Bill C-39's proposed limits on the right to strike.

Why it matters

The bill would formalize the labour minister's power to end legal strikes judged against the national interest — a major shift in Canadian labour law backed by a 296-to-26 Commons vote.

What we know

The provisions would apply only after a special mediator's report and a national-interest finding; some of Canada's largest unions say they will defy the restrictions if they become law; earlier Section 107 interventions are already being challenged in court.

What we don’t

Whether the committee will amend or strip the strike provisions, and how far union defiance would go if the law passes.

What’s next

The bill sits with a special committee for detailed study; the labour provisions are expected to be the most contested section.

Sources

Mark CarneyBill C-39right to strikeCanadian Labour Congresslabourunions

Newsletter

News. Context. What matters.

One essential briefing, written for people who would rather understand the story than scroll it.

Unsubscribe anytime. We don’t sell addresses.

Recommended